Ellen says:
Mostly what happened is that I blew it.
April reached out, asking on facebook what her Mormon friends thought about Elder Packer's talk. (Especially coming as it did after several gay teen suicides.) In retrospect, I see that this question was not unlike asking if these pants make my butt look fat. But, for several reasons, including because I had been discussing the Church's position on homosexuality with my daughter, and others, a few weeks before conference, I looked right through the person and jumped on the issue. I tried to explain rather than to comfort and affirm.
Looking back, my response was very like if I had come to April with a picture of the 8!+(# my (hypothetical) boyfriend was seeing behind my back and she had said, "Y'know, she's kind of a looker. I can see why he would wanna be with her!" and then went on to explain to me all the psychological reasons men cheat.
Yeah.
And April had an appropriate reaction.
And I felt terrible.
And I called her.
And she forgave me before I ever said a word.
One of the things that stinks for me about this is that I must have put up and taken down that post half a dozen times. I could not "get it right." I finally just posted it, and I wish now that I had not. (Except that, had I not, we would not be here now, and I am jazzed about this idea!)
The following appeared in my personal blog on November 1, 2010
Mostly what happened is that I blew it.
April reached out, asking on facebook what her Mormon friends thought about Elder Packer's talk. (Especially coming as it did after several gay teen suicides.) In retrospect, I see that this question was not unlike asking if these pants make my butt look fat. But, for several reasons, including because I had been discussing the Church's position on homosexuality with my daughter, and others, a few weeks before conference, I looked right through the person and jumped on the issue. I tried to explain rather than to comfort and affirm.
Looking back, my response was very like if I had come to April with a picture of the 8!+(# my (hypothetical) boyfriend was seeing behind my back and she had said, "Y'know, she's kind of a looker. I can see why he would wanna be with her!" and then went on to explain to me all the psychological reasons men cheat.
Yeah.
And April had an appropriate reaction.
And I felt terrible.
And I called her.
And she forgave me before I ever said a word.
One of the things that stinks for me about this is that I must have put up and taken down that post half a dozen times. I could not "get it right." I finally just posted it, and I wish now that I had not. (Except that, had I not, we would not be here now, and I am jazzed about this idea!)
The following appeared in my personal blog on November 1, 2010
"I took it down, again. My post on Elder Packer's talk, that is. It's very late, and I am exhausted, so I'm not going to try to explain why. It just feels like the right thing to do for the time being.
Next morning: Here's why: I am having all sorts of conflicting feelings about my blog post. I realized that I was seeking only to be understood, not to understand, and that my job at this moment is not to be understood, but to hold the gay community close and let them have their feelings, and feel my compassion. My compassion was totally eclipsed by my desire to be understood. There is a time for my truth, and this is not it.
I just finished reading about compassionate listening in the book Anger, by Thich Nhat Hanh, and I totally blipped it! I had a very enlightening talk with the friend who started it all (with her question) in the first place. She graciously accepted my intentions as honorable, while holding me accountable for the pain it caused her. If you read it, I apologize to you, as well. I am guilty of the same insensitivity I pointed out in Elder Packer. I have taken it down again, for the time being."